MirOS Manual: perlsec(1)


PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

NAME

     perlsec - Perl security

DESCRIPTION

     Perl is designed to make it easy to program securely even
     when running with extra privileges, like setuid or setgid
     programs.  Unlike most command line shells, which are based
     on multiple substitution passes on each line of the script,
     Perl uses a more conventional evaluation scheme with fewer
     hidden snags.  Additionally, because the language has more
     builtin functionality, it can rely less upon external (and
     possibly untrustworthy) programs to accomplish its purposes.

     Perl automatically enables a set of special security checks,
     called taint mode, when it detects its program running with
     differing real and effective user or group IDs.  The setuid
     bit in Unix permissions is mode 04000, the setgid bit mode
     02000; either or both may be set.  You can also enable taint
     mode explicitly by using the -T command line flag. This flag
     is strongly suggested for server programs and any program
     run on behalf of someone else, such as a CGI script. Once
     taint mode is on, it's on for the remainder of your script.

     While in this mode, Perl takes special precautions called
     taint checks to prevent both obvious and subtle traps.  Some
     of these checks are reasonably simple, such as verifying
     that path directories aren't writable by others; careful
     programmers have always used checks like these.  Other
     checks, however, are best supported by the language itself,
     and it is these checks especially that contribute to making
     a set-id Perl program more secure than the corresponding C
     program.

     You may not use data derived from outside your program to
     affect something else outside your program--at least, not by
     accident.  All command line arguments, environment vari-
     ables, locale information (see perllocale), results of cer-
     tain system calls ("readdir()", "readlink()", the variable
     of "shmread()", the messages returned by "msgrcv()", the
     password, gcos and shell fields returned by the "getpwxxx()"
     calls), and all file input are marked as "tainted". Tainted
     data may not be used directly or indirectly in any command
     that invokes a sub-shell, nor in any command that modifies
     files, directories, or processes, with the following excep-
     tions:

     +   Arguments to "print" and "syswrite" are not checked for
         taintedness.

     +   Symbolic methods

             $obj->$method(@args);

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           1

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

         and symbolic sub references

             &{$foo}(@args);
             $foo->(@args);

         are not checked for taintedness.  This requires extra
         carefulness unless you want external data to affect your
         control flow.  Unless you carefully limit what these
         symbolic values are, people are able to call functions
         outside your Perl code, such as POSIX::system, in which
         case they are able to run arbitrary external code.

     For efficiency reasons, Perl takes a conservative view of
     whether data is tainted.  If an expression contains tainted
     data, any subexpression may be considered tainted, even if
     the value of the subexpression is not itself affected by the
     tainted data.

     Because taintedness is associated with each scalar value,
     some elements of an array or hash can be tainted and others
     not. The keys of a hash are never tainted.

     For example:

         $arg = shift;               # $arg is tainted
         $hid = $arg, 'bar';         # $hid is also tainted
         $line = <>;                 # Tainted
         $line = <STDIN>;            # Also tainted
         open FOO, "/home/me/bar" or die $!;
         $line = <FOO>;              # Still tainted
         $path = $ENV{'PATH'};       # Tainted, but see below
         $data = 'abc';              # Not tainted

         system "echo $arg";         # Insecure
         system "/bin/echo", $arg;   # Considered insecure
                                     # (Perl doesn't know about /bin/echo)
         system "echo $hid";         # Insecure
         system "echo $data";        # Insecure until PATH set

         $path = $ENV{'PATH'};       # $path now tainted

         $ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
         delete @ENV{'IFS', 'CDPATH', 'ENV', 'BASH_ENV'};

         $path = $ENV{'PATH'};       # $path now NOT tainted
         system "echo $data";        # Is secure now!

         open(FOO, "< $arg");        # OK - read-only file
         open(FOO, "> $arg");        # Not OK - trying to write

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           2

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

         open(FOO,"echo $arg|");     # Not OK
         open(FOO,"-|")
             or exec 'echo', $arg;   # Also not OK

         $shout = `echo $arg`;       # Insecure, $shout now tainted

         unlink $data, $arg;         # Insecure
         umask $arg;                 # Insecure

         exec "echo $arg";           # Insecure
         exec "echo", $arg;          # Insecure
         exec "sh", '-c', $arg;      # Very insecure!

         @files = <*.c>;             # insecure (uses readdir() or similar)
         @files = glob('*.c');       # insecure (uses readdir() or similar)

         # In Perl releases older than 5.6.0 the <*.c> and glob('*.c') would
         # have used an external program to do the filename expansion; but in
         # either case the result is tainted since the list of filenames comes
         # from outside of the program.

         $bad = ($arg, 23);          # $bad will be tainted
         $arg, `true`;               # Insecure (although it isn't really)

     If you try to do something insecure, you will get a fatal
     error saying something like "Insecure dependency" or
     "Insecure $ENV{PATH}".

     The exception to the principle of "one tainted value taints
     the whole expression" is with the ternary conditional opera-
     tor "?:".  Since code with a ternary conditional

         $result = $tainted_value ? "Untainted" : "Also untainted";

     is effectively

         if ( $tainted_value ) {
             $result = "Untainted";
         } else {
             $result = "Also untainted";
         }

     it doesn't make sense for $result to be tainted.

     Laundering and Detecting Tainted Data

     To test whether a variable contains tainted data, and whose
     use would thus trigger an "Insecure dependency" message, you
     can use the "tainted()" function of the Scalar::Util module,
     available in your nearby CPAN mirror, and included in Perl
     starting from the release 5.8.0. Or you may be able to use
     the following "is_tainted()" function.

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           3

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

         sub is_tainted {
             return ! eval { eval("#" . substr(join("", @_), 0, 0)); 1 };
         }

     This function makes use of the fact that the presence of
     tainted data anywhere within an expression renders the
     entire expression tainted.  It would be inefficient for
     every operator to test every argument for taintedness.
     Instead, the slightly more efficient and conservative
     approach is used that if any tainted value has been accessed
     within the same expression, the whole expression is con-
     sidered tainted.

     But testing for taintedness gets you only so far.  Sometimes
     you have just to clear your data's taintedness.  Values may
     be untainted by using them as keys in a hash; otherwise the
     only way to bypass the tainting mechanism is by referencing
     subpatterns from a regular expression match. Perl presumes
     that if you reference a substring using $1, $2, etc., that
     you knew what you were doing when you wrote the pattern.
     That means using a bit of thought--don't just blindly
     untaint anything, or you defeat the entire mechanism.  It's
     better to verify that the variable has only good characters
     (for certain values of "good") rather than checking whether
     it has any bad characters.  That's because it's far too easy
     to miss bad characters that you never thought of.

     Here's a test to make sure that the data contains nothing
     but "word" characters (alphabetics, numerics, and under-
     scores), a hyphen, an at sign, or a dot.

         if ($data =~ /^([-\@\w.]+)$/) {
             $data = $1;                     # $data now untainted
         } else {
             die "Bad data in '$data'";      # log this somewhere
         }

     This is fairly secure because "/\w+/" doesn't normally match
     shell metacharacters, nor are dot, dash, or at going to mean
     something special to the shell.  Use of "/.+/" would have
     been insecure in theory because it lets everything through,
     but Perl doesn't check for that.  The lesson is that when
     untainting, you must be exceedingly careful with your pat-
     terns. Laundering data using regular expression is the only
     mechanism for untainting dirty data, unless you use the
     strategy detailed below to fork a child of lesser privilege.

     The example does not untaint $data if "use locale" is in
     effect, because the characters matched by "\w" are deter-
     mined by the locale. Perl considers that locale definitions
     are untrustworthy because they contain data from outside the
     program.  If you are writing a locale-aware program, and

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           4

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

     want to launder data with a regular expression containing
     "\w", put "no locale" ahead of the expression in the same
     block.  See "SECURITY" in perllocale for further discussion
     and examples.

     Switches On the "#!" Line

     When you make a script executable, in order to make it
     usable as a command, the system will pass switches to perl
     from the script's #! line.  Perl checks that any command
     line switches given to a setuid (or setgid) script actually
     match the ones set on the #! line.  Some Unix and Unix-like
     environments impose a one-switch limit on the #! line, so
     you may need to use something like "-wU" instead of "-w -U"
     under such systems.  (This issue should arise only in Unix
     or Unix-like environments that support #! and setuid or set-
     gid scripts.)

     Taint mode and @INC

     When the taint mode ("-T") is in effect, the "." directory
     is removed from @INC, and the environment variables
     "PERL5LIB" and "PERLLIB" are ignored by Perl. You can still
     adjust @INC from outside the program by using the "-I" com-
     mand line option as explained in perlrun. The two environ-
     ment variables are ignored because they are obscured, and a
     user running a program could be unaware that they are set,
     whereas the "-I" option is clearly visible and therefore
     permitted.

     Another way to modify @INC without modifying the program, is
     to use the "lib" pragma, e.g.:

       perl -Mlib=/foo program

     The benefit of using "-Mlib=/foo" over "-I/foo", is that the
     former will automagically remove any duplicated directories,
     while the later will not.

     Note that if a tainted string is added to @INC, the follow-
     ing problem will be reported:

       Insecure dependency in require while running with -T switch

     Cleaning Up Your Path

     For "Insecure $ENV{PATH}" messages, you need to set
     $ENV{'PATH'} to a known value, and each directory in the
     path must be absolute and non-writable by others than its
     owner and group.  You may be surprised to get this message
     even if the pathname to your executable is fully qualified.
     This is not generated because you didn't supply a full path

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           5

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

     to the program; instead, it's generated because you never
     set your PATH environment variable, or you didn't set it to
     something that was safe. Because Perl can't guarantee that
     the executable in question isn't itself going to turn around
     and execute some other program that is dependent on your
     PATH, it makes sure you set the PATH.

     The PATH isn't the only environment variable which can cause
     problems. Because some shells may use the variables IFS,
     CDPATH, ENV, and BASH_ENV, Perl checks that those are either
     empty or untainted when starting subprocesses. You may wish
     to add something like this to your setid and taint-checking
     scripts.

         delete @ENV{qw(IFS CDPATH ENV BASH_ENV)};   # Make %ENV safer

     It's also possible to get into trouble with other operations
     that don't care whether they use tainted values.  Make judi-
     cious use of the file tests in dealing with any user-
     supplied filenames.  When possible, do opens and such after
     properly dropping any special user (or group!) privileges.
     Perl doesn't prevent you from opening tainted filenames for
     reading, so be careful what you print out.  The tainting
     mechanism is intended to prevent stupid mistakes, not to
     remove the need for thought.

     Perl does not call the shell to expand wild cards when you
     pass "system" and "exec" explicit parameter lists instead of
     strings with possible shell wildcards in them.  Unfor-
     tunately, the "open", "glob", and backtick functions provide
     no such alternate calling convention, so more subterfuge
     will be required.

     Perl provides a reasonably safe way to open a file or pipe
     from a setuid or setgid program: just create a child process
     with reduced privilege who does the dirty work for you.
     First, fork a child using the special "open" syntax that
     connects the parent and child by a pipe.  Now the child
     resets its ID set and any other per-process attributes, like
     environment variables, umasks, current working directories,
     back to the originals or known safe values.  Then the child
     process, which no longer has any special permissions, does
     the "open" or other system call. Finally, the child passes
     the data it managed to access back to the parent.  Because
     the file or pipe was opened in the child while running under
     less privilege than the parent, it's not apt to be tricked
     into doing something it shouldn't.

     Here's a way to do backticks reasonably safely.  Notice how
     the "exec" is not called with a string that the shell could
     expand.  This is by far the best way to call something that
     might be subjected to shell escapes: just never call the

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           6

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

     shell at all.

             use English '-no_match_vars';
             die "Can't fork: $!" unless defined($pid = open(KID, "-|"));
             if ($pid) {           # parent
                 while (<KID>) {
                     # do something
                 }
                 close KID;
             } else {
                 my @temp     = ($EUID, $EGID);
                 my $orig_uid = $UID;
                 my $orig_gid = $GID;
                 $EUID = $UID;
                 $EGID = $GID;
                 # Drop privileges
                 $UID  = $orig_uid;
                 $GID  = $orig_gid;
                 # Make sure privs are really gone
                 ($EUID, $EGID) = @temp;
                 die "Can't drop privileges"
                     unless $UID == $EUID  && $GID eq $EGID;
                 $ENV{PATH} = "/bin:/usr/bin"; # Minimal PATH.
                 # Consider sanitizing the environment even more.
                 exec 'myprog', 'arg1', 'arg2'
                     or die "can't exec myprog: $!";
             }

     A similar strategy would work for wildcard expansion via
     "glob", although you can use "readdir" instead.

     Taint checking is most useful when although you trust your-
     self not to have written a program to give away the farm,
     you don't necessarily trust those who end up using it not to
     try to trick it into doing something bad.  This is the kind
     of security checking that's useful for set-id programs and
     programs launched on someone else's behalf, like CGI pro-
     grams.

     This is quite different, however, from not even trusting the
     writer of the code not to try to do something evil.  That's
     the kind of trust needed when someone hands you a program
     you've never seen before and says, "Here, run this."  For
     that kind of safety, check out the Safe module, included
     standard in the Perl distribution.  This module allows the
     programmer to set up special compartments in which all sys-
     tem operations are trapped and namespace access is carefully
     controlled.

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           7

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

     Security Bugs

     Beyond the obvious problems that stem from giving special
     privileges to systems as flexible as scripts, on many ver-
     sions of Unix, set-id scripts are inherently insecure right
     from the start.  The problem is a race condition in the ker-
     nel.  Between the time the kernel opens the file to see
     which interpreter to run and when the (now-set-id) inter-
     preter turns around and reopens the file to interpret it,
     the file in question may have changed, especially if you
     have symbolic links on your system.

     Fortunately, sometimes this kernel "feature" can be dis-
     abled. Unfortunately, there are two ways to disable it.  The
     system can simply outlaw scripts with any set-id bit set,
     which doesn't help much. Alternately, it can simply ignore
     the set-id bits on scripts.  If the latter is true, Perl can
     emulate the setuid and setgid mechanism when it notices the
     otherwise useless setuid/gid bits on Perl scripts.  It does
     this via a special executable called suidperl that is
     automatically invoked for you if it's needed.

     However, if the kernel set-id script feature isn't disabled,
     Perl will complain loudly that your set-id script is
     insecure.  You'll need to either disable the kernel set-id
     script feature, or put a C wrapper around the script.  A C
     wrapper is just a compiled program that does nothing except
     call your Perl program.   Compiled programs are not subject
     to the kernel bug that plagues set-id scripts.  Here's a
     simple wrapper, written in C:

         #define REAL_PATH "/path/to/script"
         main(ac, av)
             char **av;
         {
             execv(REAL_PATH, av);
         }

     Compile this wrapper into a binary executable and then make
     it rather than your script setuid or setgid.

     In recent years, vendors have begun to supply systems free
     of this inherent security bug.  On such systems, when the
     kernel passes the name of the set-id script to open to the
     interpreter, rather than using a pathname subject to med-
     dling, it instead passes /dev/fd/3.  This is a special file
     already opened on the script, so that there can be no race
     condition for evil scripts to exploit.  On these systems,
     Perl should be compiled with
     "-DSETUID_SCRIPTS_ARE_SECURE_NOW".  The Configure program
     that builds Perl tries to figure this out for itself, so you
     should never have to specify this yourself.  Most modern

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           8

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

     releases of SysVr4 and BSD 4.4 use this approach to avoid
     the kernel race condition.

     Prior to release 5.6.1 of Perl, bugs in the code of suidperl
     could introduce a security hole.

     Protecting Your Programs

     There are a number of ways to hide the source to your Perl
     programs, with varying levels of "security".

     First of all, however, you can't take away read permission,
     because the source code has to be readable in order to be
     compiled and interpreted.  (That doesn't mean that a CGI
     script's source is readable by people on the web, though.)
     So you have to leave the permissions at the socially
     friendly 0755 level.  This lets people on your local system
     only see your source.

     Some people mistakenly regard this as a security problem.
     If your program does insecure things, and relies on people
     not knowing how to exploit those insecurities, it is not
     secure.  It is often possible for someone to determine the
     insecure things and exploit them without viewing the source.
     Security through obscurity, the name for hiding your bugs
     instead of fixing them, is little security indeed.

     You can try using encryption via source filters (Filter::*
     from CPAN, or Filter::Util::Call and Filter::Simple since
     Perl 5.8). But crackers might be able to decrypt it.  You
     can try using the byte code compiler and interpreter
     described below, but crackers might be able to de-compile
     it.  You can try using the native-code compiler described
     below, but crackers might be able to disassemble it.  These
     pose varying degrees of difficulty to people wanting to get
     at your code, but none can definitively conceal it (this is
     true of every language, not just Perl).

     If you're concerned about people profiting from your code,
     then the bottom line is that nothing but a restrictive
     licence will give you legal security.  License your software
     and pepper it with threatening statements like "This is
     unpublished proprietary software of XYZ Corp. Your access to
     it does not give you permission to use it blah blah blah."
     You should see a lawyer to be sure your licence's wording
     will stand up in court.

     Unicode

     Unicode is a new and complex technology and one may easily
     overlook certain security pitfalls.  See perluniintro for an
     overview and perlunicode for details, and "Security

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                           9

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

     Implications of Unicode" in perlunicode for security impli-
     cations in particular.

     Algorithmic Complexity Attacks

     Certain internal algorithms used in the implementation of
     Perl can be attacked by choosing the input carefully to con-
     sume large amounts of either time or space or both.  This
     can lead into the so-called Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.

     +   Hash Function - the algorithm used to "order" hash ele-
         ments has been changed several times during the develop-
         ment of Perl, mainly to be reasonably fast.  In Perl
         5.8.1 also the security aspect was taken into account.

         In Perls before 5.8.1 one could rather easily generate
         data that as hash keys would cause Perl to consume large
         amounts of time because internal structure of hashes
         would badly degenerate.  In Perl 5.8.1 the hash function
         is randomly perturbed by a pseudorandom seed which makes
         generating such naughty hash keys harder. See
         "PERL_HASH_SEED" in perlrun for more information.

         The random perturbation is done by default but if one
         wants for some reason emulate the old behaviour one can
         set the environment variable PERL_HASH_SEED to zero (or
         any other integer).  One possible reason for wanting to
         emulate the old behaviour is that in the new behaviour
         consecutive runs of Perl will order hash keys dif-
         ferently, which may confuse some applications (like
         Data::Dumper: the outputs of two different runs are no
         more identical).

         Perl has never guaranteed any ordering of the hash keys,
         and the ordering has already changed several times dur-
         ing the lifetime of Perl 5.  Also, the ordering of hash
         keys has always been, and continues to be, affected by
         the insertion order.

         Also note that while the order of the hash elements
         might be randomised, this "pseudoordering" should not be
         used for applications like shuffling a list randomly
         (use List::Util::shuffle() for that, see List::Util, a
         standard core module since Perl 5.8.0; or the CPAN
         module Algorithm::Numerical::Shuffle), or for generating
         permutations (use e.g. the CPAN modules
         Algorithm::Permute or Algorithm::FastPermute), or for
         any cryptographic applications.

     +   Regular expressions - Perl's regular expression engine
         is so called NFA (Non-Finite Automaton), which among
         other things means that it can rather easily consume

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                          10

PERLSEC(1)      Perl Programmers Reference Guide       PERLSEC(1)

         large amounts of both time and space if the regular
         expression may match in several ways.  Careful crafting
         of the regular expressions can help but quite often
         there really isn't much one can do (the book "Mastering
         Regular Expressions" is required reading, see perlfaq2).
         Running out of space manifests itself by Perl running
         out of memory.

     +   Sorting - the quicksort algorithm used in Perls before
         5.8.0 to implement the sort() function is very easy to
         trick into misbehaving so that it consumes a lot of
         time.  Nothing more is required than resorting a list
         already sorted.  Starting from Perl 5.8.0 a different
         sorting algorithm, mergesort, is used.  Mergesort is
         insensitive to its input data, so it cannot be similarly
         fooled.

     See <http://www.cs.rice.edu/~scrosby/hash/> for more infor-
     mation, and any computer science text book on the algo-
     rithmic complexity.

SEE ALSO

     perlrun for its description of cleaning up environment vari-
     ables.

perl v5.8.8                2006-06-30                          11

Generated on 2014-07-04 21:17:45 by $MirOS: src/scripts/roff2htm,v 1.79 2014/02/10 00:36:11 tg Exp $

These manual pages and other documentation are copyrighted by their respective writers; their source is available at our CVSweb, AnonCVS, and other mirrors. The rest is Copyright © 2002‒2014 The MirOS Project, Germany.
This product includes material provided by Thorsten Glaser.

This manual page’s HTML representation is supposed to be valid XHTML/1.1; if not, please send a bug report – diffs preferred.